Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC

From: Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu>
To: Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RPM RH9.0 conflict with unixODBC
Date: 2003-11-25 15:11:24
Message-ID: 200311251011.24429.lowen@pari.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Monday 24 November 2003 03:05 pm, Gaetano Mendola wrote:
> This is what I got installing the RPM for 9.0:

> file /usr/include/sqltypes.h from install of
> postgresql-devel-7.4-0.3PGDG conflicts with file from package
> unixODBC-devel-2.2.3-6

Namespace collision, I guess. Makes me wonder about popping all those devel
files in /usr/include; I'll have to research. I can confirm that the
conflict exists in Fedora Core; I don't typically have unixODBC-devel
installed on my build boxes.

> BTW I think that something is wrong with the file size
> between two distributions:

> this are the rpm for 9.0:

> 3768418 Nov 24 10:07 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm

> and this for rhas-2.1:

> 2080872 Nov 24 10:08 postgresql-7.4-0.3PGDG.i386.rpm

> how you can see the sizes are completely different.
> Am I missing something ?

Compiler version and flags. Although that is a substantial difference. The
rhas-2.1 compiler is the Red Hat gcc 2.96, and the RH9 compiler is gcc 3.
Apparently gcc 3 generates large code. Sander, can you verify this, since
you built both of these?
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-11-25 15:14:11 Re: SRPM (PGDG) will not build
Previous Message Adam Witney 2003-11-25 15:03:27 [OT... But couldn't resist!] Master/Slave