Re: Commercial binary support?

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Austin Gonyou <austin(at)coremetrics(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commercial binary support?
Date: 2003-11-19 17:31:04
Message-ID: 20031119132953.I731@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Michael Meskes wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 04:19:35PM -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote:
> > I've been looking all over but I can't seem to see a company that is
> > providing *up-to-date* postgresql support and provides their own
> > supported binaries. Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here?
>
> Why do you insist on "their own binaries"? I think there are several
> companies out there providing support for a given version of PostgreSQL
> and doubt they all ask for their own binaries. At least we do not.

We don't either, nor do we worry about specific platforms ...

----
Marc G. Fournier PostgreSQL, Inc (http://www.pgsql.com)
Email: scrappy(at)pgsql(dot)com Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Liu 2003-11-19 17:34:08 unsubscribe
Previous Message Andreas Pflug 2003-11-19 17:30:37 Re: logical column position