| From: | ow <oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Date: | 2003-11-18 06:39:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20031118063907.70438.qmail@web21407.mail.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
--- Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
>
> I don't call porting Postgres to run well on something like 40% of the
> world's servers (or whatever it is) "just another port".
Statistics is a tricky thing. IMHO, there are plenty of things that are much
more important than win32 port.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-18 06:42:02 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2003-11-18 06:12:01 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dann Corbit | 2003-11-18 06:39:30 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-18 06:34:24 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ? |