| From: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
|---|---|
| To: | Manfred Spraul <manfred(at)colorfullife(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SIGPIPE handling |
| Date: | 2003-11-16 17:32:00 |
| Message-ID: | 20031116173200.GB29847@ping.be |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-patches |
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:28:06PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 12:56:10PM +0100, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > attached is an update of my automatic sigaction patch: I've moved the
> > actual sigaction calls into pqsignal.c and added a helper function
> > (pgsignalinquire(signo)). I couldn't remove the include <signal.h> from
> > fe-connect.c: it's required for the SIGPIPE definition.
> > Additionally I've added a -a flag for pgbench that sets the signal
> > handler before calling PQconnectdb.
>
> Is there a reason we don't make use of the MSG_NOSIGNAL flag to
> send()? Or is the problem in case of SSL?
Oh, seems to be a Linux only thing?
Kurt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-16 17:33:03 | Re: SIGPIPE handling |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-11-16 17:29:52 | Re: [PATCHES] SRA Win32 sync() code |