Re: Comparing databases

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comparing databases
Date: 2003-11-14 11:48:11
Message-ID: 20031114114811.GB26974@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 05:42:15PM -0500, Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> - If I were an Informix VAR, I'd be _really_ concerned after the IBM
> acquisition. Informix was a Really Big Company; size doesn't
> forcibly mitgate risk.
>
> - I don't quite understand how Sybase is still in business, unless
> Microsoft is still paying them some royalties on SQL Server...

These are also two good examples, because at one point or another,
these were both considered products that were the best in their
class, that were more or less unbeatable, and that were therefore sfe
and solid choices.

You could talk about this without naming particular products, if you
wanted. I tend to agree with Chris, however, that more words are
unlikely to be read by the PHB targets. In my experience, a
paragraph with more than three sentences makes so called technology
decisions makers' eyes glaze over.

A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2003-11-14 15:41:57 Re: Email signature
Previous Message Justin Clift 2003-11-14 06:40:34 Re: Email signature