Re: A couple of TODO notes

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A couple of TODO notes
Date: 2003-10-21 04:04:17
Message-ID: 200310210404.h9L44HI25734@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> * Allow INET subnet tests using non-constants
> >> This should say "Allow ... to be indexed" as it's otherwise a nonissue.
>
> > New text is:
> > * Allow INET subnet tests to use indexes
> > Is that right?
>
> No, because we already index subnet tests against constants. (It's pretty
> much like the situation for "column LIKE anchored-pattern" --- we
> transform to an indexable range-test.)

Uh, what should be in the TODO? I am confused.

> >> This is either done or rendered irrelevant, depending on your point of
> >> view, by the V3 protocol.
>
> > Do we allow SELECT data to come back as BINARY form (not C strings)
> > like we do with BINARY cursors?
>
> Yes, you can make that happen in the V3 protocol: you can select either
> text or binary output format for each column. Declaring a cursor BINARY
> is in fact irrelevant in V3 protocol.

How is binary selected?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-10-21 04:08:01 Re: multi-backend psql
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-10-21 03:42:35 Re: A couple of TODO notes