Re: Database Kernels and O_DIRECT

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database Kernels and O_DIRECT
Date: 2003-10-15 13:09:51
Message-ID: 200310151309.h9FD9pr10487@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark wrote:
>
> James Rogers <jamesr(at)best(dot)com> writes:
> > >
> > > Someone from Oracle is on there explaining what Oracle's needs are. Perhaps
> > > someone more knowledgable than myself could explain what would most help
> > > postgres in this area.
> >
> >
> > There is an important difference between Oracle and Postgres that makes
> > discussions of this complicated because the assumptions are different.
>
> All the more reason Postgres's view of the world should maybe be represented
> there. As it turns out Linus seems unsympathetic to the O_DIRECT approach and
> seems more interested in building a better kernel interface to control caching
> and i/o scheduling. Something that fits better with postgres's design than
> Oracle's.

Of course, the big question is why Oracle is even there talking to
Linus, and Linus isn't asking to get PostgreSQL involved. If you are
running an open-source project, you would think you would give favor to
other open-source projects. Same with MySQL favortism --- if you are
writing an open-source tool, why favor a database developed/controlled
by a single company?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-15 13:30:18 Re: postgres --help-config
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-10-15 13:06:33 Re: postgres --help-config