| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 13:29:05 |
| Message-ID: | 20031006132905.GA25586@wolff.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:55:51 +0200,
Stef <svb(at)ucs(dot)co(dot)za> wrote:
>
> Thanks, I'll try some of these, and post the results.
> The actual machines seem to be Pentium I machines,
> with 32M RAM. I've gathered that it is theoretically
> possible, so no to go try it.
I am running 7.4beta2 on a Pentium I machine with 48 MB of memory.
I was running an earlier version of Postgres (probably 7.1.x) on it
when it only had 32 MB of memory. It doesn't run very fast, but it
works OK. I remember increase from 32MB to 48MB was very noticible in
the time to serve web pages using information from the DB, but I
don't remember the details since it was a couple of years ago.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-10-06 13:32:35 | Re: Server recommendations |
| Previous Message | Ron Johnson | 2003-10-06 13:25:39 | Re: PITR (was Re: Type of application that use |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff | 2003-10-06 13:33:57 | locking/performance, Solaris performance discovery |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-10-06 12:19:51 | Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance? |