From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Lebedev <oleg(dot)lebedev(at)waterford(dot)org>, "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: TPC-R benchmarks |
Date: | 2003-10-03 17:21:50 |
Message-ID: | 200310031021.50918.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Oleg,
> I declared all the indexes that you suggested and ran vacuum full
> analyze. The query plan has not changed and it's still trying to use
> seqscan. I tried to disable seqscan, but the plan didn't change. Any
> other suggestions?
> I started explain analyze on the query, but I doubt it will finish any
> time soon.
Can I get a copy of the database so that I can tinker? I'm curious now, plus
I want our benchmarks to look good.
I have a private FTP if that helps.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stef | 2003-10-03 17:52:38 | Re: Postgres low end processing. |
Previous Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2003-10-03 16:54:42 | Re: TPC-R benchmarks |