Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL
Date: 2003-10-02 17:14:30
Message-ID: 20031002171430.GJ31782@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 11:59:03AM -0500, Matt Christian wrote:
> The project will be ported form an existing codebase which uses Oracle
> as the backend.

If that's the case, then your developers will want Postgres anyway.
MySQL is just not feature-comparable. Postgres is.

> I understand that Postgres has been closing the speed gap with MySQL,
> but I'm having trouble finding hard data on this. What specific
> information is available in this area?

What specific information is there that MySQL was ever faster ;-)
The benchmarks are all lousy, as near as anyone's been able to tell,
but Great Bridge did a benchmark some time ago which purported to
prove that PostgreSQL was almost as fast as an industry-leading
database with "7i" in its name. If that's useful to you, google for
"breat bridge benchmark".

A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-02 17:15:45 Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-10-02 17:12:31 Re: time sensitve: comparing performance to MySQL