Re: 2-phase commit

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 2-phase commit
Date: 2003-09-29 16:48:30
Message-ID: 20030929164815.GI23542@libertyrms.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 11:14:30AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > Or the slave could reject the request.
>
> Huh? The slave has that option?? In what circumstance?

In every circumstance where a stand-alone machine would have it.
Machine A may not yet know about conflicting transactions on machine
B. This is why 2PC is hard ;-)

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-29 16:52:04 Re: more i18n/l10n issues
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-09-29 16:45:47 Re: 2-phase commit