| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Date: | 2003-09-29 16:32:13 |
| Message-ID: | 200309291632.h8TGWDl27909@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
>
> > > > Or the slave could reject the request.
> > >
> > > Huh? The slave has that option?? In what circumstance?
> >
> > I thought the slave could reject if someone local already had the row
> > locked.
>
> No, not at all. The slave would need to reject phase 1 "commit ready"
> for this.
Oh, yea, thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-09-29 16:34:49 | Re: 2-phase commit |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-29 16:20:05 | Re: more i18n/l10n issues |