Re: pg_get_ruledef and extra line breaks

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_get_ruledef and extra line breaks
Date: 2003-09-29 13:47:43
Message-ID: 200309291347.h8TDlhR08228@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > No, I did not *in general*, but for now because there's no node
> > traversing and a pretty formatted query can be easily constructed by
> > yourself as for all other non-pg_get_xxx supported objects.
>
> The reason I bring it up is that if psql is changed to use the pretty
> printing option, then the rules take up several lines, instead of one
> (like the other objects)

Chris, can you show us what that would look like? I can see a reason
for using multiple lines for rules, and single lines for everything
else.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-29 13:49:58 Re: pg_dump no longer honors --no-reconnect
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2003-09-29 13:38:56 Re: 2-phase commit