Separate shared_buffer management process

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Separate shared_buffer management process
Date: 2003-09-27 02:01:33
Message-ID: 200309270201.h8R21XH27482@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Would it be a good idea to have a separate shared buffer process to
manage the cache? Could such a process take workload off of the main
backend and improve their performance?

Just an idea?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 02:02:45 Use of $(THREAD_CFLAGS) in CPPFLAGS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-27 01:03:04 Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql)