From: | Tomas Szepe <szepe(at)pinerecords(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, Javier Carlos <fjcarlos(at)correo(dot)insp(dot)mx>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition |
Date: | 2003-09-26 19:06:22 |
Message-ID: | 20030926190622.GE26641@louise.pinerecords.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
> [tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
>
> Tomas Szepe <szepe(at)pinerecords(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm afraid so. The weird thing is, we once tried running
> > VACUUM FULL followed by REINDEX and although the process
> > took ages to complete, it didn't seem to help either. :(
>
> > I'll post whatever debug data I'm asked for, just don't make
> > me run VACUUM FULL or REINDEX again please. (A full redump
> > is 10-20 times faster. :O)
>
> The output of VACUUM VERBOSE for the problem table(s) would be
> interesting.
Just posted, please see my message to
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>, CC pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
with Message-ID: <20030926184329(dot)GC26641(at)louise(dot)pinerecords(dot)com>
Thanks,
--
Tomas Szepe <szepe(at)pinerecords(dot)com>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Szepe | 2003-09-26 19:08:08 | Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 19:02:46 | Re: Postgresql 'eats' all mi data partition |