From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Date: | 2003-09-26 18:07:46 |
Message-ID: | 200309261807.h8QI7k120456@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > so it appears that cygwin's "echo" generates a different newline style
> > than what got put into sql_features.txt. A possible way to fix this is
> > to put the "\." line into sql_features.txt, but maybe there's a cleaner
> > answer. Peter, any thoughts?
>
> There's no clean answer to this on Cygwin. This specific case is just a
> little problem that we could solve locally, but in general you'll just end
> up annoying people if you require them to use consistent line endings on
> Cygwin.
This error is coming from the new 7.4 COPY code that allows \r\n as a
line terminator. Requiring the end-of-line to be consistent seemed to
be the only way to be sure we were not eating a literal carriage return
in the data stream. Let's put the "\." into sql_features.txt and see if
that fixes it, or can we use echo -c "\.\n" in initdb?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-26 17:58:21 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:05:36 | Re: 2-phase commit |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-26 18:08:10 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-09-26 17:58:21 | Re: initdb failure (was Re: [GENERAL] sequence's plpgsql) |