From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
Date: | 2003-09-13 04:08:05 |
Message-ID: | 20030913010714.Q82880@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > OK, here is an Opteron/Itanium patch that might work.
> >
> > [having now read both patches]
> >
> > Assuming that this covers the issues (what other OSes might run on
> > 64-bit machines within 7.4's lifespan?) I think there is little question
> > that this is the more conservative patch to use for 7.4. I like your
> > larger cleanup, but for 7.5.
>
> OK, all I am saying is that I can't 100% stand behind the partial patch.
S'alright, but the partial patch is better then what we have now, which is
what we're after ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ang Chin Han | 2003-09-13 04:48:00 | Re: massive quotes? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-13 03:03:33 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-13 14:49:10 | thread patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-13 03:03:33 | Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines |