Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines
Date: 2003-09-13 04:08:05
Message-ID: 20030913010714.Q82880@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > OK, here is an Opteron/Itanium patch that might work.
> >
> > [having now read both patches]
> >
> > Assuming that this covers the issues (what other OSes might run on
> > 64-bit machines within 7.4's lifespan?) I think there is little question
> > that this is the more conservative patch to use for 7.4. I like your
> > larger cleanup, but for 7.5.
>
> OK, all I am saying is that I can't 100% stand behind the partial patch.

S'alright, but the partial patch is better then what we have now, which is
what we're after ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ang Chin Han 2003-09-13 04:48:00 Re: massive quotes?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-13 03:03:33 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-13 14:49:10 thread patch
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-09-13 03:03:33 Re: [PATCHES] Reorganization of spinlock defines