Re: pg_id and pg_encoding

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_id and pg_encoding
Date: 2003-09-07 15:46:20
Message-ID: 200309071546.h87FkKD06283@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Is there any reason to keep separate pg_id and pg_encoding programs, or
> should they be merged into a C version of initdb? AFAICS initdb is the
> only thing that uses them.

Yes, I assume they would go away with a C version.

> We'll also need to decide the Windows equivalent of the 'don't run as
> root' rule - or even if we want to enforce it at all, given that it
> appears to be very common practice on Windows to run all services as a
> user with Administrator privileges.

I assume we will relax that for Win32. I don't think non-Administrators
have the same isolation on Win32 as non-root users have on Unix.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-09-07 15:57:36 Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-09-07 15:43:42 Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever