| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, osdldbt-general(at)lists(dot)sourceforge(dot)net |
| Subject: | Re: Prelimiary DBT-2 Test results |
| Date: | 2003-09-05 15:15:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200309051515.h85FFjp25456@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> For heavily updated systems, you should have WAL buffers bit more. I don't know
> exact imact of that setting though. You could try 32/64/128. On the same note,
> if you are getting checkpoints too frequently, you can try increasing
> checkpoint segments. The logs will tell as such.
Only 7.4beta reports if checkpoints are too frequent.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-05 15:17:35 | checkpoints too frequent |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-09-05 14:39:45 | Re: 64-bit pgsql |