| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-27 15:05:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200308271505.h7RF5l527397@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "BM" == Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
>
> BM> Hold --- a non-FULL vacuum is taking 6+ hours on two tables? That seems
> BM> impossible.
>
> Well, did I mention I'm saturating my disk I/O bandwidth at the same
> time with other queries? ;-)
But six hours. It is my understanding that a sequential scan is roughly
the same load as a non-FULL vacuum. Are you saying a sequential scan
takes +6 hours too? How can any work get done?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-08-27 15:07:25 | Re: Books for PostgreSQL? |
| Previous Message | Deepa K | 2003-08-27 15:02:30 | Arrays is stored procedure |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-08-27 15:16:12 | Re: Buglist |
| Previous Message | Mendola Gaetano | 2003-08-27 14:58:50 | SetVariable |