| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-21 15:01:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20030821150159.GE9803@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:40:29PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Given lazy vacuum doesn't hold locks for long periods, it could be
> an idea to continuously spend 1% of your disk bandwidth on a
> background vacuum. As for vacuum full, I don't know if you could do
> the same thing.
Assuming that one can keep up with the dust bunnies this way, though,
one wouldn't need to do vacuum full. This would definitely be a way
cool feature, if implementable.
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-21 15:04:09 | Re: Buglist |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-21 14:59:21 | Re: Buglist |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-21 15:04:09 | Re: Buglist |
| Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-21 14:59:21 | Re: Buglist |