Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Childs <Blue(dot)Dragon(at)blueyonder(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
Date: 2003-08-15 14:35:17
Message-ID: 20030815073357.G19338-100000@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 15 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> > select * from fk where not exists(select * from pk where pk.key=fk.key)
> > and key is not null;
> > (doing seq scan/subplan doing index scan - which is probably close to the
> > current system)
>
> Actually, even that would probably be noticeably better than the current
> system. I haven't profiled it (someone should) but I suspect that
> executor startup/shutdown time is a huge hit. Even though the trigger
> is caching a plan, it has to instantiate that plan for each referencing
> tuple --- and the executor is not designed for quick startup/shutdown.

Yeah, but it was pretty much the best I could do testing on the command
line. And it was still a fair bit more expensive than using IN (my tests
on various key types showed anywhere from 15% to 300% better speed on IN
over exists for this).

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-08-15 14:38:30 Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
Previous Message Martin_Hurst 2003-08-15 14:31:47 Replication project

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2003-08-15 14:38:30 Re: [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
Previous Message Christoph Haller 2003-08-15 14:26:01 Copyright (C) 1996-2002