Re: set constraints docs page

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: set constraints docs page
Date: 2003-08-13 15:19:58
Message-ID: 20030813081405.T48694-100000@megazone.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I notice on the SET CONSTRAINTS doc page, it says SET CONSTRAINTS
> <constraint> ...
>
> But it doesn't at all make it clear what <constraint> is, since cosntraint
> names are per-relation I thought?

It's a constraint name. IIRC, it happens to affect all such named
constraints currently. We should probably allow <tablename>.<constraint>
(and <schema>.<tablename>.<constraint>) as well. Too late for 7.4, but
this can happen for 7.5 if there aren't any objections.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-08-13 16:52:37 Re: reuse sysids security hole?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-13 14:32:14 Re: Parsing speed (was Re: pgstats_initstats() cost)