Re: fix for broken ecpg doc markup

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: fix for broken ecpg doc markup
Date: 2003-08-07 04:17:24
Message-ID: 200308070417.h774HOB09055@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Applied. Thanks.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joe Conway wrote:
> Noticed broken markup in ecpg.sgml. Attached patch fixes it. Please apply.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe

> Index: doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /opt/src/cvs/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml,v
> retrieving revision 1.47
> diff -c -r1.47 ecpg.sgml
> *** doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml 1 Aug 2003 13:53:36 -0000 1.47
> --- doc/src/sgml/ecpg.sgml 6 Aug 2003 19:43:46 -0000
> ***************
> *** 703,709 ****
>
> <variablelist>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>CARDINALITY</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> number of rows in the result set
> --- 703,709 ----
>
> <variablelist>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>CARDINALITY</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> number of rows in the result set
> ***************
> *** 712,718 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>DATA</literal><term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> actual data item (therefore, the data type of this field
> --- 712,718 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>DATA</literal></term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> actual data item (therefore, the data type of this field
> ***************
> *** 722,728 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>DATETIME_INTERVAL_CODE</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> ?
> --- 722,728 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>DATETIME_INTERVAL_CODE</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> ?
> ***************
> *** 731,737 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>DATETIME_INTERVAL_PRECISION</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> not implemented
> --- 731,737 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>DATETIME_INTERVAL_PRECISION</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> not implemented
> ***************
> *** 740,746 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>INDICATOR</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> the indicator (indicating a null value or a value truncation)
> --- 740,746 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>INDICATOR</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> the indicator (indicating a null value or a value truncation)
> ***************
> *** 749,755 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>KEY_MEMBER</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> not implemented
> --- 749,755 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>KEY_MEMBER</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> not implemented
> ***************
> *** 758,764 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>LENGTH</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the datum in characters
> --- 758,764 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>LENGTH</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the datum in characters
> ***************
> *** 767,773 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>NAME</literal> (string)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> name of the column
> --- 767,773 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>NAME</literal> (string)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> name of the column
> ***************
> *** 776,782 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>NULLABLE</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> not implemented
> --- 776,782 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>NULLABLE</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> not implemented
> ***************
> *** 785,791 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>OCTET_LENGTH</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the character representation of the datum in bytes
> --- 785,791 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>OCTET_LENGTH</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the character representation of the datum in bytes
> ***************
> *** 794,800 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>PRECISION</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> precision (for type <type>numeric</type>)
> --- 794,800 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>PRECISION</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> precision (for type <type>numeric</type>)
> ***************
> *** 803,809 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>RETURNED_LENGTH</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the datum in characters
> --- 803,809 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>RETURNED_LENGTH</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the datum in characters
> ***************
> *** 812,818 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>RETURNED_OCTET_LENGTH</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the character representation of the datum in bytes
> --- 812,818 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>RETURNED_OCTET_LENGTH</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> length of the character representation of the datum in bytes
> ***************
> *** 821,827 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>SCALE</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> scale (for type <type>numeric</type>)
> --- 821,827 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>SCALE</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> scale (for type <type>numeric</type>)
> ***************
> *** 830,836 ****
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>TYPE</literal> (integer)<term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> numeric code of the data type of the column
> --- 830,836 ----
> </varlistentry>
>
> <varlistentry>
> ! <term><literal>TYPE</literal> (integer)</term>
> <listitem>
> <para>
> numeric code of the data type of the column

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-08-07 04:48:22 psql \d should use pg_get_viewdef (oid, true)
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-08-07 04:00:31 more bad markup -- jdbc.sgml