Re: Unused Indexes

You need to convert the int's to bigints.

select id where col1 = 1::bigint and col2 = 1::bigint

Regards,
Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim McAuley <mcauleyt(at)tcd(dot)ie>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 13:46:46
To:pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: [GENERAL] Unused Indexes

Hi,

I have a table which I have populated with over 5000 entries. There is a
combined index placed on two of the columns (both bigint). I am trying
a simple select (i.e. select id where col1 = 1 and col2 = 1) covering
these two columns and it keeps using a seq scan. Is this correct? I
would have thought that with this number of entries that an index scan
should be used.

I am testing this using postgresql 7.3.3 on windows 2000 using cygwin.

Doing "set enable_seqscan to off" does not change the results of the
explain operation.

I also tried setting a single index on just one of the columns and
running an appropriate search; it still uses a seq scan. At what stage
will the planner normally start using an index scan?

Any hints appreciated.

Tim

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster