Re: best way to determine start of new statement within a function? (resend)

From: elein <elein(at)varlena(dot)com>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: elein <elein(at)norcov(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Hackers (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: best way to determine start of new statement within a function? (resend)
Date: 2003-07-28 17:23:57
Message-ID: 20030728102357.G16834@cookie
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I was starting to wonder if my message got there.
Tom had asked for a clear definition of "what is a
statement" hence the wide description.

If I wrote this up more formally where would I put
it so we could talk about it when the various issues
come up? Maybe a friend-of-the-court unapproved functional
spec in the dev docs? Noting, of course, that
this is functional not implementation specifications.

I'm surprised these issues did not come
up with who ever is working on nested transactions
since that is in the same realm.

elein

On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 09:58:42AM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> elein wrote:
> >Do you want me to try to write this up into
> >more formal definitions?
> >
>
> I think it would be a useful starting point for future discussions, but
> it goes way beyond what I was looking for at the moment.
>
> Joe
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-07-28 17:47:20 Re: Can't Build 7.3.4 on OS X
Previous Message Hunter Hillegas 2003-07-28 17:19:37 Re: Can't Build 7.3.4 on OS X