Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Criteria for contrib/ versus gborg?
Date: 2003-07-22 19:05:46
Message-ID: 20030722160528.E81611@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Did I miss part of a thread here? :)

On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> > Arguments? None of those three address the obvious marketing benefit
> > of having replication shipping with the main tarball, I know.
>
> Those are pretty strong arguments ... and we can't let PostgreSQL new
> "marketing awareness" sway us to the point that we start making technically
> unfeasable decisions. So, I'm backing down ... I think despite the PR
> argument in favor of including eRServer as a download is seriously outweighed
> by Andrew's technical argument.
>
> So that we can get some PR milage out of it though, can we make sure that
> eRServer gets posted to GBorg about the same day as the 7.4 release? That
> way we can at least include eRServer in our announcement.
>
> --
> -Josh Berkus
> Aglio Database Solutions
> San Francisco
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Francisco Figueiredo Jr. 2003-07-22 19:15:15 Why select * from function doesn't work when function has return type void??
Previous Message Dennis Gearon 2003-07-22 18:55:45 Re: Checkpoints