From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
Date: | 2003-07-22 18:36:06 |
Message-ID: | 200307221136.06749.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Scott,
> No prob. It looks like
> HPUX on PA-RISC,
> IRIX on MIPS,
> Linux on S/390,
> Solaris on Sparc, (listed in the /doc/FAQ_Solaris as 64 bit)
> and NetBSD on Sparc are all 64 bit tested / compiled.
I think for simplicity that we should stick to the hardware: e.g.,
Sparc, PA-RISC, MIPS, and S/390. (yes, Sparc is 64-bit).
> AIX on RS6000,
> FreeBSD on Alpha
> Linux on Alpha
> Linux on MIPS
> Linux on Sparc
> NetBSD on MIPS
Also, we should skip these if you can't find evidence of production PostgreSQL
servers on them. Unless you can and your only question is are they 64-bit?
We are talking about "official" or at least "tested" support.
> Anyone have anymore input on this? Are there other issues (i.e. we're
> only half 64 bit and half 32 bit in some areas) that we need to make
> clear?
We don't need to make this clear to the press, no.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-07-22 18:37:17 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-07-22 18:30:52 | Re: 7.4 Press Release -- Draft #3 |