From: | Brage Førland <brage(at)zoo(dot)uib(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Properties dialogue/pane |
Date: | 2003-07-17 18:20:03 |
Message-ID: | 20030717182003.GA30563@sisyfos.zoo.uib.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 07:05:16PM +0200, Andreas Pflug wrote:
> Brage Førland wrote:
>
> >The columns belonging to a foreign key are named 'Child columns' in the
> >properties pane. Any reason they are not just called 'Columns'?
> >
> and the property dialog calls it "local column"....
> When working with design tools, I always wondered which column is on
> which side of the reference. I want the namings to clearly indicate
> this, so how should we name that beast?
Quoting the PostgreSQL manual:
[...]
We say that in this situation the orders table is the referencing table
and the products table is the referenced table. Similarly, there are
referencing and referenced columns.
However, I should think it would suffice to call the 'local columns' just
columns and the referenced columns, well, 'referenced columns' in most
situations.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Raphaël Enrici | 2003-07-17 19:12:48 | Re: [kpli] Tanya PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2003-07-17 17:47:59 | Re: Properties dialogue/pane |