| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Dual Xeon + HW RAID question |
| Date: | 2003-07-14 11:19:25 |
| Message-ID: | 20030714111925.GD24166@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 11:25:14AM -0700, Nikolaus Dilger wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> Since you want the fastest speed I would do the 2 data
> disks in RAID 0 (striping) not RAID 1 (mirroring).
Note that RAID 0 buys you nothing at all in redundancy. So if the
point is to be able to recover from a disk failure, you need 1 (or
some combination of 0 and 1, or 5).
A
--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-07-14 11:44:24 | Re: Pgsql - Red Hat Linux - VS MySQL VS MSSQL |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-07-14 06:37:32 | Re: Pgsql - Red Hat Linux - VS MySQL VS MSSQL |