Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Date: 2003-07-04 20:31:35
Message-ID: 20030704203135.GB21568@feivel.fam-meskes.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:29:37PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. If so, can I get away with applying this post-feature-freeze? I can
> argue that it's a bug fix, but perhaps some will disagree.

I'd say it is a bug fix.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
ICQ: 179140304, AIM: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message johnnnnnn 2003-07-04 20:39:57 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL
Previous Message Rod Taylor 2003-07-04 19:29:38 Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2003-07-04 21:20:34 Re: [HACKERS] Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-04 19:29:37 Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection