Re: How many fields in a table are too many

From: PeterKorman <calvin-pgsql-ml(at)eigenvision(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How many fields in a table are too many
Date: 2003-06-29 16:11:48
Message-ID: 20030629161148.GC11500@eigenvision.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 01:19:09PM +0530, Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2003 at 3:44, btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 03:17:12AM -0400, btober(at)seaworthysys(dot)com
> > > wrote:
> > >> > I have a table with 13 fields. Is that
> > >> > too many fields for one table.
> > >> > Mark
> > >> Thirteen? No way. I've got you beat with 21:
> > > Pfft! Is *that* all? I've got a table with 116 fields.
> > I *knew* a number of these responses would be forthcoming... :)
>
> I remember somebody posting a database schema with 500 fields.
>
> Don't worry as long as it works. When you have problems, post it on
> performance. First advice you would get is to normalize it..:-)
>
> Bye
> Shridhar

Do normal form classifications go into negative numbers?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Maksim Likharev 2003-06-29 19:18:20 Re: PG crash on simple query
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-06-29 14:16:54 Re: PG crash on simple query