| From: | Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | AgentM <agentm(at)cmu(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux |
| Date: | 2003-06-27 02:10:03 |
| Message-ID: | 200306271210.03464.philip@utiba.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:58 am, AgentM wrote:
> According to POSIX 1003.1c-1995, no such mutex-altering function exists.
Thanks for the info - useful to know.
> lock the mutex- potentially again). Either that or the recursive locks
> can be eliminated.
Avoiding recursive locks is my preference - the only two I have found ought to
be easy to avoid.
> Just for the record, OS X, Solaris 5.8, FreeBSD 4.8, and LinuxThreads
> support the UNIX98 version, so perhaps this isn't so important after
> all.
Add Tru64 (aka OSF1, aka DEC Unix) to that list. Just checked it.
Regards, Philip.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-27 02:16:37 | Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-27 02:09:13 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-06-27 02:16:37 | Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux |
| Previous Message | AgentM | 2003-06-27 01:58:18 | Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux |