Re: lru cache replacement

From: Yutaka tanida <yutaka(at)nonsensecorner(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: lru cache replacement
Date: 2003-06-24 16:29:24
Message-ID: 20030625012840.B056.YUTAKA@nonsensecorner.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Wed, 25 Jun 2003 00:43:56 +0900
Yutaka tanida <yutaka(at)nonsensecorner(dot)com> wrote:

> > BTW, when you were running your test case, what shared_buffers did you
> > use?
>
> I use 16,64,256 and 4096.

I missed. My shown result(+4% cache hit rate) is shared_buffers=64.

---
Yutaka tanida<yutaka(at)hi-net(dot)zaq(dot)ne(dot)jp>
謎のWebsite http://www.nonsensecorner.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kurt Roeckx 2003-06-24 17:02:14 Re: [HACKERS] ss_family in hba.c
Previous Message Austin Gonyou 2003-06-24 16:22:08 Table Partitioning