Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-23 19:14:49
Message-ID: 200306231914.h5NJEnM27979@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Well, it is a nice test template for people who aren't shell script
> > experts, and I have been in the habit of pushing stuff I use into /tools
> > so it is available for others.
>
> I know and I'm not happy about it. The PostgreSQL source tree isn't a
> repository of everyone's favorite shell scripts. There's an official
> method to build and test a PostgreSQL installation. If that is flawed or
> incomplete, then let's talk about it. But everyone pushing out their own
> little test methodology without further consideration is not going to help
> this discussion.

I put stuff in /tools so if something happens to me, you guys can keep
going. Do I have to be clearer that that? I have RELEASE_CHANGES,
which Tom used for 7.3.X releases, pgindent, stuff for finding
missing/extraneous includes, static requirements, stuff like that.

Unless you can find someone else who agrees with you, it stays.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-23 19:17:44 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2003-06-23 19:08:41 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze