| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Date: | 2003-06-21 14:51:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20030621115037.R51411@hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> Time was that we had a major release every 3 or 4 months. As the
> project matures I think it's appropriate for the cycle to get slower: a
> lot of low-hanging fruit is gone, so we have larger jobs to tackle, plus
> users are using PG for larger databases and don't want to face
> major-version changes too often. But I don't want it to get to be a
> year on average between releases, at least not yet. 8 or 9 months seems
> reasonable, and by that standard we're overdue.
Note that with how we've been releasing 'minors' on v7.3.x semi-regularly,
slippage isn't *as* big an issue as it could have been ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-21 15:01:13 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-21 14:46:46 | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |