Re: Which database part 2

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Which database part 2
Date: 2003-06-13 18:45:39
Message-ID: 20030613184539.GA19711@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Fri, Jun 13, 2003 at 21:28:01 +0300,
Kaarel <kaarel(at)future(dot)ee> wrote:
> Here is one more question that has aroused uring these days:
>
> Why did SourceForge.net move from PostgreSQL to DB2?

I think they became involved with IBM shortly before the change.

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2003-06-13 18:58:12 The information principle. (was RE: Which database part 2)
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-13 18:43:06 Re: Which database part 2