Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Estimate of when CVS will be available again?
Date: 2003-06-09 22:35:11
Message-ID: 200306092235.h59MZBL17609@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>
> Erk ...
>
> Okay, I have CVSup up and available again, which allows you to download
> the whole repository locally to work on ... is there a strong reason why
> anoncvs is *required* to the repository with this available?
>
> Sean cites both performance and security as reasons to *not* make anoncvs
> available ...

But this requires cvsup, which you have to admit, as a Modula program,
is pretty weird. Sure people can get cvsup binaries, but we are an open
source project, and it is nice to rely on standard tools. I realize the
cvsup source is distributed, but as it is written in Modula, the source
code is pretty close to useless. I think we have to offer anoncvs.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-09 23:52:19 Re: Linux 2.6 kernel,
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2003-06-09 22:30:05 Re: Linux 2.6 kernel, tuned for use with databases -