Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)

From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni(at)sime(dot)com>
To: Dave Tenny <tenny(at)attbi(dot)com>, Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)
Date: 2003-05-28 18:29:43
Message-ID: 200305282029.44152.mweilguni@sime.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> I'm reminded to relay to the PostgreSQL devos that I might be able to do
> more in the join or subquery department if
> PostgreSQL had better performing MAX functions and a FIRST function for
> selecting rows from groups.
> ("Performing" being the operative word here, since the extensible
> architecture of PostgreSQL currently makes for poorly
> performing MAX capabilities and presumably similar user defined
> aggregate functions).

MIN/MAX is almost in every case replaceable:
select bar
from foo
order by bar limit 1;

instead of
select max(bar) from foo;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-05-28 18:39:14 Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)
Previous Message Dave Tenny 2003-05-28 18:17:21 Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)