Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Dave Tenny <tenny(at)attbi(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)
Date: 2003-05-28 18:39:14
Message-ID: 20030528183914.GA6118@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 14:08:02 -0400,
Dave Tenny <tenny(at)attbi(dot)com> wrote:
> Andreas Pflug wrote:
>
> I'm reminded to relay to the PostgreSQL devos that I might be able to do
> more in the join or subquery department if
> PostgreSQL had better performing MAX functions and a FIRST function for
> selecting rows from groups.
> ("Performing" being the operative word here, since the extensible
> architecture of PostgreSQL currently makes for poorly
> performing MAX capabilities and presumably similar user defined
> aggregate functions).

Have you tried replacing max with a subselect that uses order by and limit?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-05-28 18:41:50 Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)
Previous Message Mario Weilguni 2003-05-28 18:29:43 Re: IN list processing performance (yet again)