Re: Bug(s) or not?

From: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug(s) or not?
Date: 2003-05-26 11:29:25
Message-ID: 20030526112925.GA18075@wolff.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 14:17:52 +0400,
Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> q=# select count(*) from q;
> count
> -------
> 2
> (1 row)
>
> q=# select count(*) from q limit 1;
> count
> -------
> 2
> (1 row)
>
> q=# select count(*) from q limit 1 offset 1;
> count
> -------
> (0 rows)
>
> q=# select count(*) from q offset 1;
> count
> -------
> (0 rows)
>
> q=# select count(*) from q offset 0;
> count
> -------
> 2
> (1 row)
>
> I understand that it isn't correct query, but why pgsql do something
> strange instead of say 'error'?

The above queries appear to be correct. The count returns a single row
with the number of rows in the table. If you skip over that row using
offset, you aren't going to get any rows.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message XST 2003-05-26 12:38:19 Tom and Fernando: Status for "WITH RECURSIVE"
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2003-05-26 10:17:52 Bug(s) or not?