| From: | "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CIDR in pg_hba.conf |
| Date: | 2003-05-07 19:59:42 |
| Message-ID: | 200305071559.42635.darcy@druid.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 13:44, scott.marlowe wrote:
> On Wed, 7 May 2003, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > Is anyone else uncomfortable with variable number of fields? I know
> > there is prior art but it still spooks me a little. How about a space
> > after the address and before the slash? That way the netmask is in the
> > same field as always (as are the following fields) and it's just an
> > alternative syntax.
>
> If that's the case, then just drop the / from the address and make the
> mask field varialble, so if it has .s in it it's a netmask, otherwise it's
> a number like a CIDR's second half.
That works for me too.
--
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy(at){druid|vex}.net> | Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/ | and a sheep voting on
+1 416 425 1212 (DoD#0082) (eNTP) | what's for dinner.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-05-07 20:07:15 | Re: CIDR in pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | D'Arcy J.M. Cain | 2003-05-07 19:57:41 | Re: CIDR in pg_hba.conf |