Re: Hack around lack of CORRESPONDING BY in EXCEPT?

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Lucas Adamski <ladamski(at)manageww(dot)com>
Cc: "Postgresql Performance Mailing list (E-mail)" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Hack around lack of CORRESPONDING BY in EXCEPT?
Date: 2003-05-07 19:43:29
Message-ID: 20030507124143.V30050-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance


On Wed, 7 May 2003, Lucas Adamski wrote:

Of course my last suggestion won't work since you need to get the event.pk
field out. The actual subquery would need to be more complicated and
probably involve an IN or EXISTS. :(

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bernd von den Brincken 2003-05-07 19:57:56 Re: [SQL] An unresolved performance problem.
Previous Message Patrick Hatcher 2003-05-07 19:40:19 Re: Hack around lack of CORRESPONDING BY in EXCEPT?