Re: Server error

From: Erik Ronström <kvarken(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Server error
Date: 2003-05-07 10:48:38
Message-ID: 20030507104838.16633.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi again,

thanks for the answers.

--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > Sig 11 means you have bad memory or CPU, about 99.9% of the time.
>
> In my part of the universe, about 99% of the time it means you've
> found a software bug ;-) ... especially if you can create an example
> case that is reproducible on another machine. Erik, can you wrap up
> a test case?

99% + 99.9%, that makes 198.9 percent :-)

Unfortunatly, the function depends heavily on the database structure. I
tried to extract the essential parts to reproduce the problem within a
small test DB, but then everything worked just fine! But I will post an
example when I get one...

> And which PG version are you running, anyway?

7.2.1. I've heard it has some bugs, but the guy running the server
refuses to upgrade to _anything_ that isn't cleared by Debian. 7.3
should have been cleared some days ago, but it hasn't, don't know why.

Best regards
Erik

__________________________________________________
Yahoo! Plus
For a better Internet experience
http://www.yahoo.co.uk/btoffer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Johnson 2003-05-07 11:45:48 Re: Small bug in postgres' ./configure script and invalid
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2003-05-07 09:48:48 Re: Cancelling a command.