Re: close() vs. closesocket()

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: close() vs. closesocket()
Date: 2003-04-25 16:03:05
Message-ID: 200304251603.h3PG36V22309@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> >
> > We have never been into abstraction for the sake of abstraction.
>
> Would you say that is a *good* thing or a *bad* thing?

A good thing --- too much abstraction is bad --- look at Mozilla for a
chilling example.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-25 16:09:10 Re: close() vs. closesocket()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-25 15:34:56 Re: close() vs. closesocket()

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-25 16:09:10 Re: close() vs. closesocket()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-04-25 15:34:56 Re: close() vs. closesocket()