From: | ow <oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
Subject: | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Date: | 2003-04-15 19:35:18 |
Message-ID: | 20030415193518.14217.qmail@web21414.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm of the opinion that the availability of schemas solves most of
> the problems that people say they need cross-database access for. If
> you want cross-database access, first say why putting your data into
> several schemas in a single database doesn't get the job done for
you.
Some databases contain lots of data, e.g. dbs that contain historical
data. No one wants to have one HUGE db that runs all company's apps,
takes hours (if not days) to recover and when this huge db goes down
none of the apps is available.
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ryan Mahoney | 2003-04-15 19:41:57 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-04-15 19:32:09 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-04-15 19:37:58 | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-04-15 19:30:58 | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-04-15 19:37:58 | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
Previous Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-04-15 19:30:58 | Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2003-04-15 20:27:07 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-04-15 19:17:17 | Re: Are we losing momentum? |