Re: Are we losing momentum?

From: ow <oneway_111(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Subject: Re: Are we losing momentum?
Date: 2003-04-15 19:35:18
Message-ID: 20030415193518.14217.qmail@web21414.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm of the opinion that the availability of schemas solves most of
> the problems that people say they need cross-database access for. If

> you want cross-database access, first say why putting your data into
> several schemas in a single database doesn't get the job done for
you.

Some databases contain lots of data, e.g. dbs that contain historical
data. No one wants to have one HUGE db that runs all company's apps,
takes hours (if not days) to recover and when this huge db goes down
none of the apps is available.

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Mahoney 2003-04-15 19:41:57 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-04-15 19:32:09 Re: Tech Docs and Consultants

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-04-15 19:37:58 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-04-15 19:30:58 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2003-04-15 19:37:58 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2003-04-15 19:30:58 Re: Upgrade to Red Hat Linux 9 broke PostgreSQL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2003-04-15 20:27:07 Re: Are we losing momentum?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-04-15 19:17:17 Re: Are we losing momentum?