| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, David Wheeler <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
| Cc: | elein(at)varlena(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Date: | 2003-04-13 00:07:49 |
| Message-ID: | 200304121707.49701.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
David, Marc,
> Josh? Right now, you seem to be willing to step up to the plate ... Will
> Bricolage work for you, or are you firm set on Zapatec?
>
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, David Wheeler wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 12, 2003, at 12:32 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > "Bricolage is a full-featured, open-source content-management and
> > > publishing system. Features include intuitive and highly configurable
> > > administration, workflow, permissions, templating, server-neutral
> > > output,
> > > distribution, and document management."
Bricolage is fine ... I just always got the impression from you, David, that
it is a little heavy-duty for techdocs. We don't, for example, need
workflow, server-neutral output, distribution, or document management. Is
there a "Bricolage Light"?
Now, Bricolage for the *main* postgreSQL.org site ....
And I'm not clear on what we're proposing, here, Marc ... is Bricolage
something we would install on Hub.org's servers, or would David host the
site?
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-04-13 00:27:57 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |
| Previous Message | David Wheeler | 2003-04-12 21:44:54 | Re: Tech Docs and Consultants |