From: | "Han" <zhouhanok(at)vip(dot)sina(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: updateable cursors & visibility |
Date: | 2003-03-28 04:34:57 |
Message-ID: | 20030328042755.6F60647631A@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hiroshi Inoue,
But still can't explain this:
SENSITIVE => not READ_ONLY
It's in the ODBC Spec.
>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, no idea. Peter's idea is that FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE, so
>> INSENSITIVE has to be READONLY because the update has to see other
>> changes to be accurate.
>>
>> I think clearly SENSITIVE/READONLY should be possible, so:
>>
>> READONLY/SENSITIVE possible
>> READONLY/INSENSITIVE possible
>> FOR UPDATE/SENSITIVE possible
>> FOR UPDATE/INSENSITIVE not possible
>>
>> READONLY can be either way, while FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE.
>
>SENSITIVE doesn't mean *not INSENESITIVE*.
>INSENSITIVE doesn't mean *not SENSITIVE*.
>
>regards,
>Hiroshi Inoue
> http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
Regards!
Han
zhouhanok(at)vip(dot)sina(dot)com
2003-03-28
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 2003-03-28 05:37:36 | Re: Solution to UPDATE...INSERT problem |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-03-28 03:53:12 | Re: updateable cursors & visibility |