Re: pg_dump version conflict

From: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump version conflict
Date: 2003-03-26 22:11:59
Message-ID: 20030326171159.E5705@mail.libertyrms.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Mar 26, 2003 at 12:36:14PM -0800, Tom Haddon wrote:

> through - if "sort" wasn't installed, god knows what else wasn't.

I know what that is like. Our production environment explicitly
forbids compilers (among other things), so we can't build the software
there.

We therefore build a binary tree (along with all the libraries needed
-- we have a private copy of readline, for instance!) on another box,
and then tar up the whole thing, including necessary libraries, and
put it there. It's a bit of a hassle, but it works, and prevents me
from waiting 3 months while some drone decides whether sed or nawk
are security risks. So something similar might work for you. You
need an extra, compatible machine, however. And some extra disk in
your hosted environment.

> Any recommendations. Lower end of pricing (>$30/month) appreciated?

I'm afriad not. The techdocs.postgresql.org site has some
suggestions, though.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dennis Oudijk 2003-03-26 22:14:08 Monitoring server loads
Previous Message Tom Haddon 2003-03-26 20:36:14 Re: pg_dump version conflict