Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > > > > Vadim planned to implement the savepoints functionality
> > > > > using UNDO mechanism. AFAIR it was never denied explicitly.
> > > >
> > > > If you go to the TODO.detail/transactions archive, there was discussion
> > > > of using UNDO, and most felt that there were too many problems of having
> > > > to manage the undo system,
> > >
> > > This is closely related to the basics of PostgreSQL.
> > > Pleas don't decide it implicitly.
> >
> > We took a vote and UNDO lost --- do you want to do another vote?
>
> Sorry I missed the vote. Where is it ?

I can't find the vote in the archive. As I remember, Vadim and a few
others liked UNDO, while more liked the current approach.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073